GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs GTS 360M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 360M
2010
1 GB DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5, 38 Watt
1.69

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms GTS 360M by a whopping 1456% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking936206
Place by popularitynot in top-10067
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameN11E-GS1GN20-P1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)10 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962560
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed575 MHz1222 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors727 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate17.60118.8
Floating-point processing power0.2757 gflops7.603 gflops
Gigaflops413no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVILVDSHDMIDual Link DVIDisplayPortVGANo outputs
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTS 360M 1.69
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.29
+1456%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTS 360M 653
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10142
+1453%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p18
−1456%
280−290
+1456%
Full HD21
−257%
75
+257%
1440p2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
4K1−2
−2500%
26
+2500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1450%
62
+1450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Battlefield 5 0−1 80−85
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2800%
55−60
+2800%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2820%
140−150
+2820%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1233%
80
+1233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−619%
110−120
+619%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3167%
98
+3167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−844%
85−90
+844%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−579%
231
+579%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Battlefield 5 0−1 80−85
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1025%
45
+1025%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2800%
55−60
+2800%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1525%
65−70
+1525%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2820%
140−150
+2820%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1183%
77
+1183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−619%
110−120
+619%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2500%
78
+2500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1067%
105
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−350%
50−55
+350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−497%
203
+497%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−900%
40
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2800%
55−60
+2800%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2820%
140−150
+2820%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1017%
67
+1017%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−475%
92
+475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−900%
90
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−317%
50
+317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+21.4%
28
−21.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2600%
81
+2600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2100%
22
+2100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%
Hitman 3 7−8
−557%
46
+557%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1280%
69
+1280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−1444%
139
+1444%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1300%
56
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−650%
14−16
+650%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 14−16
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−867%
29
+867%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35
+0%
35
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+0%
26
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61
+0%
61
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 20
+0%
20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
+0%
34
+0%

This is how GTS 360M and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 1456% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 257% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 1900% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 2500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTS 360M is 21% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 3167% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTS 360M is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 50 tests (74%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (25%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 26.29
Recency 7 January 2010 10 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 60 Watt

GTS 360M has 57.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1455.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 360M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTS 360M
GeForce GTS 360M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 30 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 360M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4053 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.