RTX A4500 Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5850 with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

ATI Mobility HD 5850
2010
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.65

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5850 by a whopping 2237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91782
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.3421.76
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameBroadwayGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8005888
Core clock speed500 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,040 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt140 Watt
Texture fill rate20.00276.0
Floating-point processing power0.8 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs40184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−2005%
400−450
+2005%
Full HD25
−2100%
550−600
+2100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−2420%
120−130
+2420%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−23100%
230−240
+23100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−2420%
120−130
+2420%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−3325%
130−140
+3325%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−23100%
230−240
+23100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
Fortnite 7−8
−2443%
170−180
+2443%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
Valorant 35−40
−524%
230−240
+524%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−2420%
120−130
+2420%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−3325%
130−140
+3325%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−23100%
230−240
+23100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−651%
270−280
+651%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%
Dota 2 20−22
−630%
140−150
+630%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
Fortnite 7−8
−2443%
170−180
+2443%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−4367%
130−140
+4367%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2029%
140−150
+2029%
Valorant 35−40
−524%
230−240
+524%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−3325%
130−140
+3325%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2350%
95−100
+2350%
Dota 2 20−22
−630%
140−150
+630%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−2029%
140−150
+2029%
Valorant 35−40
−524%
230−240
+524%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
−2443%
170−180
+2443%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2283%
280−290
+2283%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−929%
170−180
+929%
Valorant 12−14
−2125%
260−270
+2125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2925%
120−130
+2925%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−3600%
110−120
+3600%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−3300%
30−35
+3300%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−513%
90−95
+513%
Valorant 9−10
−2689%
250−260
+2689%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 21−24
Dota 2 3−4
−3767%
110−120
+3767%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2700%
55−60
+2700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1867%
55−60
+1867%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5850 and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 2005% faster in 900p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 2100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 23100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 53 tests (85%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (15%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 38.56
Recency 7 January 2010 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 140 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5850 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2237% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5850 in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon HD 5850 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5850
Mobility Radeon HD 5850
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5850 or RTX A4500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.