NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs AMD Radeon R7 M365X
Comparison of GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X architecture, market type and release date.
GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Maximum GPU temperature
Texture fill rate
47.2 billion / sec
23.04 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm)
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
70.4 GB / s
64 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X.
Two Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor support
Maximum VGA resolution
Audio input for HDMI
S / PDIF
Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
GTS 250 0.16
R7 M365X 0.81 +406.3%
GTS 250 876
R7 M365X 905 +3.3%
Let's see how good GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
Wider memory bus (256 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (70.4 vs 64 GB/s)
SLI (Scalable Link Interface - a technology for uniting several NVIDIA GPUs processing power in one PC)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
3D Vision Surround
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 M365X
406.3% faster (about 5 times) in synthetic tests
Much newer (5 May 2015 vs 4 March 2009)
More pipelines (384 vs 128)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 55 nm)
So, GTS 250 or R7 M365X?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD Radeon R7 M365X.
Should you still have questions on choice between GeForce GTS 250 and Radeon R7 M365X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.