ATI Radeon 9600 PRO vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

Place in the ranking	491	1443
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.07	0.43
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code name	N14P-?	RV350
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 November 2013 (11 years ago)	1 October 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	980 MHz	400 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 1300 Million	60 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	2x ~50 Watt	18 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	1.600
ROPs	no data	4
TMUs	no data	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	2x 2 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5400 MHz	300 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	9.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	9.0 (9_0)
OpenGL	no data	2.0
OpenCL	no data	N/A
Vulkan	-	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	0−1
Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16	0−1
Far Cry 5	20−22	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	55−60	0−1
Hitman 3	16−18	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	0−1
Metro Exodus	24−27	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	0−1
Battlefield 5	24−27	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16	0−1
Far Cry 5	20−22	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	55−60	0−1
Hitman 3	16−18	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	0−1
Metro Exodus	24−27	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16	0−1
Far Cry 5	20−22	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	55−60	0−1
Hitman 3	16−18	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60	0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14	0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	35−40	0−1
Hitman 3	12−14	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20	0−1
Metro Exodus	10−12	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35	0−1
Metro Exodus	6−7	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	10−11	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

0−1

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.70	0.11
Recency	1 November 2013	1 October 2003
Chip lithography	28 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	2 Watt	18 Watt

GT 755M SLI has a 7809.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 PRO in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook card while Radeon 9600 PRO is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.