GeForce GT 740M vs Radeon RX Vega 11

Place in the ranking	605	876
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	10.89	4.35
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code name	Raven	GK208
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	10 May 2018 (6 years ago)	20 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	704	384
Core clock speed	300 MHz	980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1251 MHz	980 MHz
Number of transistors	4,940 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.04	31.36
Floating-point processing power	1.761 TFLOPS	0.7526 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	44	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	2 GB
Standard memory configuration	no data	DDR3/GDDR5
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	14.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Motherboard Dependent	No outputs
eDP 1.2 signal support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support	no data	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
HDMI	-	+
HDCP content protection	-	+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	-	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support	-	+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	-	+
Optimus	-	+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 API
Shader Model	6.7 (6.4)	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.1	1.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.126
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.47
+166%

GT 740M 2.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2111
+165%

GT 740M 796

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX Vega 11 5483
+197%

GT 740M 1848

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 11 3494
+204%

GT 740M 1151

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX Vega 11 20848
+182%

GT 740M 7403

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	25 +56.3%	16 −56.3%
1440p	6 +200%	2−3 −200%
4K	11 +175%	4−5 −175%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
+125%

4−5

−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20 +186%	7−8 −186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	23 +2200%	1−2 −2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry 5	22 +633%	3−4 −633%
Far Cry New Dawn	25 +400%	5−6 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	89 +1013%	8−9 −1013%
Hitman 3	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Metro Exodus	33 +175%	12−14 −175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	38 +280%	10−11 −280%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +33.3%	35−40 −33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35 +400%	7−8 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry 5	19 +533%	3−4 −533%
Far Cry New Dawn	19 +280%	5−6 −280%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +875%	8−9 −875%
Hitman 3	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Metro Exodus	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 +70%	10−11 −70%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −15.8%	22 +15.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +33.3%	35−40 −33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	11 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry 5	14 +367%	3−4 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	29 +263%	8−9 −263%
Hitman 3	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +88.9%	18−20 −88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	15 +50%	10−11 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +150%	4 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +33.3%	35−40 −33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+275%

4−5

−275%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +233%	3−4 −233%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Hitman 3	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 +218%	10−12 −218%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+100%

5−6

−100%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5 +150%	2−3 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Forza Horizon 4	12 +200%	4−5 −200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
+100%

3−4

−100%

This is how RX Vega 11 and GT 740M compete in popular games:

RX Vega 11 is 56% faster in 1080p
RX Vega 11 is 200% faster in 1440p
RX Vega 11 is 175% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 11 is 2200% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 740M is 16% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega 11 is ahead in 53 tests (98%)
GT 740M is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	5.47	2.06
Recency	10 May 2018	20 June 2013
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	45 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 165.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 28.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 740M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX Vega 11 is a desktop card while GeForce GT 740M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.