Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
AMD Radeon HD 6570M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Combined performance score
GeForce GT 710 outperforms Radeon HD 6570M by 19% in our combined benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 902 | 962 |
Place by popularity | 52 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.04 | 0.05 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | GK208B | Capilano |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 27 March 2014 (10 years old) | 26 November 2010 (13 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | no data |
Current price | $81 (2.3x MSRP) | $338 |
HD 6570M has 25% better value for money than GT 710.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 400 |
CUDA cores | 192 | no data |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 650 MHz |
Number of transistors | 915 million | 627 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 30 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 | 13.00 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 520.0 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GT 710 and Radeon HD 6570M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | MXM-II |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | no data |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | 3 displays | no data |
HDMI | + | no data |
HDCP | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision | + | no data |
PureVideo | + | no data |
PhysX | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 8
−200%
| 24
+200%
|
1440p | 3
+50%
| 2−3
−50%
|
4K | 7
+40%
| 5−6
−40%
|
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hitman 3 | 5
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+11.1%
|
9−10
−11.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Metro Exodus | 3
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how GT 710 and HD 6570M compete in popular games:
1080p resolution:
- HD 6570M is 200% faster than GT 710
1440p resolution:
- GT 710 is 50% faster than HD 6570M
4K resolution:
- GT 710 is 40% faster than HD 6570M
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 710 is 400% faster than the HD 6570M.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6570M is 33.3% faster than the GT 710.
All in all, in popular games:
- GT 710 is ahead in 13 tests (41%)
- HD 6570M is ahead in 1 test (3%)
- there's a draw in 18 tests (56%)
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 1.63 | 1.37 |
Recency | 27 March 2014 | 26 November 2010 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 30 Watt |
The GeForce GT 710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6570M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GT 710 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6570M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.