GeForce GT 630 OEM vs GT 650M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GT 650M SLI
2012
2x2 GB GDDR5
5.10
+207%

GT 650M SLI outperforms GT 630 OEM by a whopping 207% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking590902
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.700.02
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN13E-GEGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price$545 $429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 650M SLI has 3400% better value for money than GT 630 OEM.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
Core clock speed790 MHz875 MHz
Boost clock speed835 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data14.00
Floating-point performanceno data336.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 650M SLI and GeForce GT 630 OEM compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width2x 128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1782 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p79
+229%
24−27
−229%
Full HD53
+231%
16−18
−231%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Hitman 3 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Hitman 3 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4 0−1
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

This is how GT 650M SLI and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:

  • GT 650M SLI is 229% faster in 900p
  • GT 650M SLI is 231% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.10 1.66
Recency 22 March 2012 24 April 2012

The GeForce GT 650M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M SLI
GeForce GT 650M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.