GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs GT 640M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GT 640M Mac Edition
2013
512 MB GDDR5, 32 Watt
1.09

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms GT 640M Mac Edition by a whopping 4906% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking104939
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGK107GN21-X11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 February 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$50 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3849728
Core clock speed745 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2040 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt150 Watt (80 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate23.84515.3
Floating-point performance572.2 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−5733%
175
+5733%
1440p2−3
−6450%
131
+6450%
4K1−2
−8400%
85
+8400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 54.56
Recency 3 February 2013 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 150 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 497 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.