Radeon HD 7570M vs GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2

GT 640 GT 640 OEM GT 640 OEM Rebrand GT 640 Rev. 2
VS
Radeon HD 7550M Radeon HD 7570M Radeon HD 7650M Radeon HD 7670M Radeon HD 7690M Radeon HD 7690M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 with Radeon HD 7570M, including specs and performance data.

GT 640 Rev. 2
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 49 Watt
3.56
+221%

GT 640 Rev. 2 outperforms HD 7570M by a whopping 221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GT 640 Rev. 2 GT 640 Rev. 2
HD 7570M HD 7570M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7241082
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency4.995.86
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK208Thames
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 May 2013 (11 years ago)7 January 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$89 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384480
Core clock speed1046 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistors915 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate33.4712.00
Floating-point processing power0.8033 TFLOPS0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.06 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p40−45
+186%
14
−186%
Full HD60−65
+200%
20
−200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p1.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Hitman 3 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GT 640 Rev. 2 and HD 7570M compete in popular games:

  • GT 640 Rev. 2 is 186% faster in 900p
  • GT 640 Rev. 2 is 200% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 46 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.56 1.11
Recency 29 May 2013 7 January 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 13 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has a 220.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7570M, on the other hand, has 276.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7570M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 7570M is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon HD 7570M
Radeon HD 7570M
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
ATI HD 4870 Radeon HD 4870
HD 7570M Radeon HD 7570M
vs
HD 8410G Radeon HD 8410G
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
Radeon 540 Radeon 540
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
vs
R5 (Kaveri) Radeon R5 (Kaveri)
GT 730 GeForce GT 730
vs
S9300 X2 FirePro S9300 X2
GTX 745 OEM GeForce GTX 745 OEM
vs
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
GT 610 PCI GeForce GT 610 PCI
GTX 760 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
vs
ATI HD 5830 Radeon HD 5830
GT 640 Rev. 2 GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
HD 7570 OEM Radeon HD 7570 OEM
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
GTX 780 GeForce GTX 780
vs
GTX 470M GeForce GTX 470M
GTX 645 OEM GeForce GTX 645 OEM
vs
RX 6600 Radeon RX 6600
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
GTX 1070 GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 27 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 93 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7570M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.