GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs GT 625M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 625M and GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 625M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.24

RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms GT 625M by a whopping 5171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking104528
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameN13M-GSGN21-X9
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores967424
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speedUp to 625 MHz1860 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2280 MHz
Number of transistors585 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt150 Watt (60 - 150 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate10.00386.3
Floating-point performance0.24 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz20000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 625M 1.24
RTX 4080 Mobile 65.36
+5171%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 625M 478
RTX 4080 Mobile 25221
+5176%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 625M 921
RTX 4080 Mobile 58631
+6266%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−5233%
160
+5233%
1440p2−3
−5350%
109
+5350%
4K1−2
−7600%
77
+7600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4867%
149
+4867%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4667%
143
+4667%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4167%
120−130
+4167%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−10800%
210−220
+10800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1767%
110−120
+1767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1371%
200−210
+1371%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2500%
200−210
+2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−336%
140−150
+336%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4033%
124
+4033%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−4167%
120−130
+4167%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−10800%
210−220
+10800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1767%
110−120
+1767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1371%
200−210
+1371%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−4288%
351
+4288%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−336%
140−150
+336%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3933%
121
+3933%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10400%
100−110
+10400%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−10800%
210−220
+10800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1767%
110−120
+1767%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1371%
200−210
+1371%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−3875%
318
+3875%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−1464%
172
+1464%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−233%
110
+233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5400%
110−120
+5400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4000%
80−85
+4000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8100%
82
+8100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−957%
70−75
+957%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2975%
120−130
+2975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 140
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−3617%
220−230
+3617%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2175%
90−95
+2175%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 45−50

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−5400%
55
+5400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 35−40
Far Cry 5 0−1 30−35

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1600%
50−55
+1600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 118
+0%
118
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 237
+0%
237
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hitman 3 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 211
+0%
211
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+0%
117
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 121
+0%
121
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 56
+0%
56
+0%

This is how GT 625M and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 5233% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 5350% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 7600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4080 Mobile is 10900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 Mobile is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 65.36
Recency 1 October 2012 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 150 Watt

GT 625M has 900% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 5171% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 625M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 625M
GeForce GT 625M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 31 vote

Rate GeForce GT 625M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 515 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.