UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs GeForce GT 520M
Aggregated performance score
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 321% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1121 | 729 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
GPU code name | N12P-GP/LV | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 28 May 2019 (4 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | no data |
Current price | $237 (4x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 32 |
CUDA cores | 48 | no data |
Core clock speed | 740 / 600 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1100 MHz |
Number of transistors | 585 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 12-25 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion/sec | no data |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | no data |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on GeForce GT 520M and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM Capacity and Type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | no data |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported GPU Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | no data |
Quick Sync | no data | + |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 API | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | no data |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 321% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 284% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 324% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 7
−286%
| 27−30
+286%
|
Full HD | 12
−8.3%
| 13
+8.3%
|
1200p | 7
−286%
| 27−30
+286%
|
4K | 2−3
−350%
| 9
+350%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−133%
|
7
+133%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−16.7%
|
7
+16.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
−50%
|
12−14
+50%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
−100%
|
2
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−50%
|
9−10
+50%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−233%
|
10
+233%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5
+66.7%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Hitman 3 | 3−4
−100%
|
6−7
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−25%
|
10−11
+25%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 4−5
−50%
|
6−7
+50%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−33.3%
|
4−5
+33.3%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−20%
|
6−7
+20%
|
This is how GT 520M and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 286% faster than GT 520M in 900p
- UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 8.3% faster than GT 520M in 1080p
- UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 286% faster than GT 520M in 1200p
- UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 350% faster than GT 520M in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 400% faster than the GT 520M.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 24 tests (96%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (4%)
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 0.72 | 3.03 |
Recency | 5 January 2011 | 28 May 2019 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.