GeForce RTX 3050 OEM vs GT 425M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 425M with GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, including specs and performance data.

GT 425M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 23 Watt
1.35

RTX 3050 OEM outperforms GT 425M by a whopping 2187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1018177
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.0916.56
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF108GA106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962560
Core clock speed560 MHz1515 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors585 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt130 Watt
Texture fill rate8.960140.4
Floating-point processing power0.215 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 425M 1.35
RTX 3050 OEM 30.87
+2187%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 425M 522
RTX 3050 OEM 11907
+2181%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p11
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Full HD17
−1959%
350−400
+1959%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2173%
750−800
+2173%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2173%
750−800
+2173%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−2043%
300−310
+2043%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2150%
180−190
+2150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−2173%
250−260
+2173%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−2173%
750−800
+2173%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−2100%
110−120
+2100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−2067%
130−140
+2067%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2150%
90−95
+2150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

This is how GT 425M and RTX 3050 OEM compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 OEM is 2173% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3050 OEM is 1959% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 30.87
Recency 3 September 2010 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 130 Watt

GT 425M has 465.2% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 OEM, on the other hand, has a 2186.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 425M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 425M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GeForce GT 425M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 58 votes

Rate GeForce GT 425M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 160 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.