Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce GT 330M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GT 330M
0.54

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 330M by 8919% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking117256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data9.94
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN11P-GE1TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 January 2010 (14 years old)13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299
Current price$448 $3083 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 330M and RTX 6000 have a nearly equal value for money.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484608
CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed575 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors486 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate9.200509.8
Floating-point performance121.44 gflopsno data
Gigaflops182no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 330M and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 330M 0.54
RTX 6000 48.70
+8919%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 330M by 8919% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 330M 211
RTX 6000 18877
+8846%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 330M by 8846% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p10
−8900%
900−950
+8900%
Full HD17
−8724%
1500−1550
+8724%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−8233%
500−550
+8233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−8900%
180−190
+8900%
Hitman 3 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−8650%
350−400
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Hitman 3 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−8650%
700−750
+8650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−8900%
270−280
+8900%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−8900%
450−500
+8900%

This is how GT 330M and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • RTX 6000 is 8900% faster than GT 330M

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 6000 is 8724% faster than GT 330M

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.54 48.70
Recency 10 January 2010 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 260 Watt

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 330M is a notebook card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
GeForce GT 330M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 109 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 120 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.