Quadro RTX 6000 vs GeForce GT 630M

Place in performance ranking	956	57
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.02	10.06
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N13P-GL/GL2	TU102
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	6 December 2011 (12 years old)	13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$6,299
Current price	$1121	$3083 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 50200% better value for money than GT 630M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	4608
CUDA cores	96	no data
Core clock speed	Up to 800 MHz	1440 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	260 Watt
Texture fill rate	Up to 12.8 billion/sec	509.8
Floating-point performance	253.4 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 630M and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3\GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	Up to 128bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 32.0 GB/s	672.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	no data
HDCP	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
DirectX 11.2	12 API	no data
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 630M 1.39

RTX 6000 48.73
+3406%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 3406% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 630M 540

RTX 6000 18872
+3395%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 3395% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 630M 2339

RTX 6000 138352
+5815%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms GeForce GT 630M by 5815% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	19 −3321%	650−700 +3321%
Full HD	16 −3338%	550−600 +3338%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
−3400%

140−150

+3400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −3400%	350−400 +3400%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Hitman 3	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −3329%	240−250 +3329%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −3400%	350−400 +3400%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Hitman 3	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −3329%	240−250 +3329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Hitman 3	4−5 −3400%	140−150 +3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −3233%	300−310 +3233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Hitman 3	2−3 −3400%	70−75 +3400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −3329%	240−250 +3329%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%

This is how GT 630M and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

RTX 6000 is 3321% faster than GT 630M

1080p resolution:

RTX 6000 is 3338% faster than GT 630M

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.39	48.73
Recency	6 December 2011	13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	260 Watt