GeForce GT 630 OEM vs GT 330M

Place in the ranking	1212	942
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.70	2.31
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GT216	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	10 January 2010 (14 years ago)	24 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	192
Core clock speed	625 MHz	875 MHz
Number of transistors	486 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.00	14.00
Floating-point processing power	0.06528 TFLOPS	0.336 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	182	no data
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	16	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	891 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.28 GB/s	28.51 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	10 −170%	27−30 +170%
Full HD	17 −194%	50−55 +194%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−167%

8−9
+167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Hitman 3	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Hitman 3	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Hitman 3	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−100%

2−3
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−167%

8−9
+167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−150%

5−6
+150%

This is how GT 330M and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:

GT 630 OEM is 170% faster in 900p
GT 630 OEM is 194% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.56	1.66
Recency	10 January 2010	24 April 2012
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	50 Watt

GT 330M has 117.4% lower power consumption.

GT 630 OEM, on the other hand, has a 196.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 630 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 330M is a notebook card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.