Radeon RX 580 2048SP vs GeForce GT 325M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 325M with Radeon RX 580 2048SP, including specs and performance data.

GT 325M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 23 Watt
0.44

RX 580 2048SP outperforms GT 325M by a whopping 4427% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1243274
Place by popularitynot in top-10062
Power efficiency1.339.26
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGT216Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (14 years ago)15 October 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed450 MHz1168 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1284 MHz
Number of transistors486 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200164.4
Floating-point processing power0.09504 TFLOPS5.259 TFLOPS
Gigaflops142no data
ROPs832
TMUs16128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMIVGASingle Link DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 325M 0.44
RX 580 2048SP 19.92
+4427%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 325M 169
RX 580 2048SP 7685
+4447%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−4364%
1250−1300
+4364%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−4364%
1250−1300
+4364%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−4364%
1250−1300
+4364%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−4400%
270−280
+4400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 19.92
Recency 10 January 2010 15 October 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 150 Watt

GT 325M has 552.2% lower power consumption.

RX 580 2048SP, on the other hand, has a 4427.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 580 2048SP is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 325M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 325M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 580 2048SP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 325M
GeForce GT 325M
AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP
Radeon RX 580 2048SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 12 votes

Rate GeForce GT 325M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3071 vote

Rate Radeon RX 580 2048SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.