Quadro T600 Mobile vs GeForce GT 240

Place in performance ranking	989	307
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	no data
Architecture	GT2xx (2009−2012)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GT215	TU117
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	17 November 2009 (14 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$80	no data
Current price	$708 (8.9x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	896
CUDA cores	96	no data
Core clock speed	550 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1400 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	69 Watt	40 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105C C	no data
Texture fill rate	17.60	74.76
Floating-point performance	257.28 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 240 and Quadro T600 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB or 1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	54.4 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DVIVGAHDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.6
OpenGL	3.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 240 1.32

T600 Mobile 16.48
+1148%

Quadro T600 Mobile outperforms GeForce GT 240 by 1148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 240 5221

T600 Mobile 39112
+649%

Quadro T600 Mobile outperforms GeForce GT 240 by 649% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−104%

51
+104%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−1200%

24−27
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1550%	30−35 +1550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1550%	30−35 +1550%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1225%	53 +1225%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1183%	75−80 +1183%
Hitman 3	2−3 −1500%	30−35 +1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1220%	65−70 +1220%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1433%	45−50 +1433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1225%	53 +1225%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −1200%	50−55 +1200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1550%	30−35 +1550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1550%	30−35 +1550%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1533%	49 +1533%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1183%	75−80 +1183%
Hitman 3	2−3 −1500%	30−35 +1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −1220%	65−70 +1220%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −1433%	45−50 +1433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −1200%	39 +1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1200%	52 +1200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −1200%	50−55 +1200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1550%	30−35 +1550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	4−5
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1400%	45 +1400%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1183%	75−80 +1183%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	9−10
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1300%	28 +1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −1200%	50−55 +1200%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

2−3

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	1−2
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	1−2

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	4−5
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	9−10
Far Cry 5	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1500%	30−35 +1500%
Hitman 3	0−1	7−8
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	1−2

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

4−5

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	9−10
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	8−9
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	9−10
Horizon Zero Dawn	0−1	1−2
Metro Exodus	0−1	4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

3−4

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1250%	50−55 +1250%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1250%	50−55 +1250%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1250%	50−55 +1250%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1400%	45−50 +1400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1550%	30−35 +1550%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −1450%	30−35 +1450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −1500%	30−35 +1500%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1450%	30−35 +1450%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	10−12

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	8−9
Hitman 3	0−1	12−14
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	3−4
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	12−14
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2100%	21−24 +2100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	6−7

This is how GT 240 and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:

T600 Mobile is 104% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.32	16.48
Recency	17 November 2009	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB or 1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	69 Watt	40 Watt