HD Graphics 400 vs GeForce GT 130M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 130M and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 130M
2009
Up to 1 GB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.32

HD Graphics 400 outperforms GT 130M by a whopping 203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12881095
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1012.83
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameG96CBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2009 (16 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3296
Core clock speed600 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors314 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate9.6007.200
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
Gigaflops144no data
ROPs82
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3L
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 (DDR2)/800 (GDDR3) MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 (DDR2)/25 (GDDR3)no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.3
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A+
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Valorant 24−27
−188%
75−80
+188%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−186%
40−45
+186%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Valorant 24−27
−188%
75−80
+188%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 10−11
−200%
30−33
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Valorant 24−27
−188%
75−80
+188%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−200%
45−50
+200%
Valorant 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 0.97
Recency 8 January 2009 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 203.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 283.3% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 130M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
GeForce GT 130M
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 24 votes

Rate GeForce GT 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 421 vote

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 130M or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.