HD Graphics 400 vs GeForce GT 320M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 320M and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 320M
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.24

HD Graphics 400 outperforms 320M by a whopping 308% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14081131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.3813.15
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameG96CBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)1 April 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3296
Core clock speed500 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors314 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0007.200
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs1612
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIRing Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.3
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A+
CUDA1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Valorant 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Valorant 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Dota 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Valorant 24−27
−285%
100−105
+285%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Valorant 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 0.98
Recency 15 June 2009 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 308.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 320M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 136 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 443 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 320M or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.