HD Graphics 400 vs GeForce GT 320M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 320M and HD Graphics 400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 320M
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.27

HD Graphics 400 outperforms GT 320M by a whopping 319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13441075
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.3413.13
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameG96CBraswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3296
Core clock speed500 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors314 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0007.200
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs82
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIRing Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.3
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A+
CUDA1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Hitman 3 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−293%
110−120
+293%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Hitman 3 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−293%
110−120
+293%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Hitman 3 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−293%
110−120
+293%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 1.13
Recency 15 June 2009 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 318.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 400 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 320M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 122 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 404 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.