GeForce GT 240M LE vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1137not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.36no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1G96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (10 years ago)15 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9632
Core clock speed320 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2009.600
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs1216
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LDDR2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.33.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 15 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 23 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 283.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 445 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or GeForce GT 240M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.