GeForce MX110 vs GT 1030

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 1030 with GeForce MX110, including specs and performance data.

GT 1030
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
6.39
+71.3%

GT 1030 outperforms GeForce MX110 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking544669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.430.87
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN17P-G1N16V-GMR1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)1 January 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data
Current price$137 (1.7x MSRP)$1057

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 1030 has 179% better value for money than GeForce MX110.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed1228 MHz965 MHz
Boost clock speed1670 MHz993 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate35.2323.83
Floating-point performance1,127 gflops762.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 1030 and GeForce MX110 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed6000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s40.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 1030 6.39
+71.3%
GeForce MX110 3.73

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 1030 2466
+71.3%
GeForce MX110 1440

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 71% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 1030 4728
+123%
GeForce MX110 2121

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 123% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 1030 20192
+121%
GeForce MX110 9124

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 121% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 1030 3625
+111%
GeForce MX110 1714

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 111% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 1030 22069
+95.9%
GeForce MX110 11266

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 96% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 1030 9711
+130%
GeForce MX110 4219

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 130% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GT 1030 219163
+76.7%
GeForce MX110 124036

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 77% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GT 1030 9349
+177%
GeForce MX110 3374

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 177% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GT 1030 10307
+123%
GeForce MX110 4625

GT 1030 outperforms MX110 by 123% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
+26.3%
19
−26.3%
1440p17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
4K9
+80%
5−6
−80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+55.6%
9
−55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+50%
8
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+60%
10
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+58.8%
17
−58.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+61.5%
13
−61.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+61.5%
13
−61.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+50%
8
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+55.6%
9
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+66.7%
6
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+58.8%
16−18
−58.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+63.6%
11
−63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

This is how GT 1030 and GeForce MX110 compete in popular games:

  • GT 1030 is 26% faster in 1080p
  • GT 1030 is 89% faster in 1440p
  • GT 1030 is 80% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.39 3.73
Recency 17 May 2017 1 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

The GeForce GT 1030 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX110 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 1030 is a desktop card while GeForce MX110 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030
NVIDIA GeForce MX110
GeForce MX110

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7283 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 2151 vote

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.