GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs MX110

Place in performance ranking	667	359
Place by popularity	96	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.90	1.36
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	N16V-GMR1	GP107
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 January 2018 (6 years ago)	21 May 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price	$1057	$1118

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 3 GB has 51% better value for money than GeForce MX110.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	768
Core clock speed	965 MHz	1392 MHz
Boost clock speed	993 MHz	1518 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	23.83	72.86
Floating-point performance	762.6 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce MX110 and GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	84.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX110 3.73

GTX 1050 3 GB 13.28
+256%

GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms MX110 by 256% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce MX110 1443

GTX 1050 3 GB 5138
+256%

GTX 1050 3 GB outperforms MX110 by 256% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−233%

60−65
+233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8
−243%

24−27

+243%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9 −233%	30−33 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Battlefield 5	14 −221%	45−50 +221%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10 −250%	35−40 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Far Cry 5	10 −250%	35−40 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	10 −250%	35−40 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	16 −244%	55−60 +244%
Hitman 3	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7 −243%	24−27 +243%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7 −243%	24−27 +243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 −238%	27−30 +238%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Battlefield 5	12 −233%	40−45 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −221%	45−50 +221%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Far Cry 5	9 −233%	30−33 +233%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Forza Horizon 4	12 −233%	40−45 +233%
Hitman 3	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Metro Exodus	2 −250%	7−8 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 −233%	30−33 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Battlefield 5	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Far Cry 5	8 −238%	27−30 +238%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −220%	16−18 +220%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Hitman 3	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Hitman 3	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

This is how GeForce MX110 and GTX 1050 3 GB compete in popular games:

GTX 1050 3 GB is 233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.73	13.28
Recency	1 January 2018	21 May 2018
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	75 Watt