Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce G105M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated120
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data46.34
Power efficiencyno data15.28
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGT218Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 July 2009 (15 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162304
CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed500 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors260 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000248.4
Floating-point processing power0.03424 TFLOPS7.949 TFLOPS
Gigaflops38no data
ROPs464
TMUs8144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data268 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 (DDR2)/700 (GDDR3) MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 (DDR2)/11 (GDDR3)448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVIDisplayPortHDMI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce G105M 122
RX 5700 14459
+11752%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2009 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 180 Watt

GeForce G105M has 1185.7% lower power consumption.

RX 5700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G105M and Radeon RX 5700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G105M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G105M
GeForce G105M
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 72 votes

Rate GeForce G105M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1680 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.