RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce FX Go 5200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce FX Go 5200 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms FX Go 5200 by a whopping 169750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1501 | 118 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 23.54 |
| Architecture | no data | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | NV31M | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 March 2003 (21 year ago) | 21 March 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5 | 3072 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 115 Watt (35 - 115 Watt TGP) |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 300 MHz | 16000 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DDR | 12 Ultimate |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−164900%
|
1650−1700
+164900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−164900%
|
1650−1700
+164900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−164900%
|
1650−1700
+164900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−164900%
|
1650−1700
+164900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−167400%
|
3350−3400
+167400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−169067%
|
10150−10200
+169067%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−169692%
|
40750−40800
+169692%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−164900%
|
1650−1700
+164900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−169344%
|
15250−15300
+169344%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−164900%
|
1650−1700
+164900%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−169275%
|
13550−13600
+169275%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−167400%
|
3350−3400
+167400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−169067%
|
10150−10200
+169067%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−168233%
|
5050−5100
+168233%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−169692%
|
40750−40800
+169692%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−164900%
|
1650−1700
+164900%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−169275%
|
13550−13600
+169275%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−167400%
|
3350−3400
+167400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−169067%
|
10150−10200
+169067%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−168233%
|
5050−5100
+168233%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−169692%
|
40750−40800
+169692%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−169567%
|
25450−25500
+169567%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−164900%
|
1650−1700
+164900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−164900%
|
1650−1700
+164900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−167400%
|
3350−3400
+167400%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−167400%
|
3350−3400
+167400%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.02 | 33.97 |
| Recency | 1 March 2003 | 21 March 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 5 nm |
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has a 169750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go 5200 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce FX Go 5200 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
