RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Radeon 530

Place in performance ranking	778	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.59	no data
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Meso	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	21 March 2017 (7 years ago)	21 March 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	$627	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	6144
Core clock speed	1024 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1024 MHz	1565 MHz
Number of transistors	1,550 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.50	300.5
Floating-point performance	784.1 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 530 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3/GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	280.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 530 2.63

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 54.02
+1954%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon 530 by 1954% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon 530 1016

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20908
+1958%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon 530 by 1958% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Radeon 530 5015

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 123023
+2353%

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms Radeon 530 by 2353% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−1775%

300−350
+1775%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6
−1900%

100−105

+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16 −1775%	300−310 +1775%
Battlefield 5	14 −1900%	280−290 +1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12 −1900%	240−250 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Far Cry 5	10 −1900%	200−210 +1900%
Far Cry New Dawn	9 −1900%	180−190 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	20 −1900%	400−450 +1900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −1900%	80−85 +1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9 −1900%	180−190 +1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	15 −1900%	300−310 +1900%
Battlefield 5	13 −1900%	260−270 +1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4 −1900%	80−85 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Far Cry 5	10 −1900%	200−210 +1900%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −1900%	80−85 +1900%
Metro Exodus	4 −1900%	80−85 +1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4 −1900%	80−85 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	11 −1900%	220−230 +1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −1900%	120−130 +1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −1900%	180−190 +1900%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1900%	80−85 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Hitman 3	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1700%	18−20 +1700%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1900%	80−85 +1900%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −1900%	120−130 +1900%

This is how Radeon 530 and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 1775% faster than Radeon 530 in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.63	54.02
Recency	21 March 2017	21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	70 Watt