FirePro S9150 vs Radeon RX 560
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 521 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 89 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.48 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.94 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) |
| GPU code name | Polaris 21 | Hawaii |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 April 2017 (8 years ago) | 7 August 2014 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 2816 |
| Core clock speed | 1175 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1275 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 6,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 81.60 | 158.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.611 TFLOPS | 5.069 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 64 |
| TMUs | 64 | 176 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 704 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 170 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Form factor | no data | full height / full length |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 April 2017 | 7 August 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 235 Watt |
RX 560 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.
FirePro S9150, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between Radeon RX 560 and FirePro S9150. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Radeon RX 560 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S9150 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
