Radeon 625 vs GeForce GT 220M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 220M and Radeon 625, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 220M
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.36

625 outperforms GT 220M by a whopping 575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1313846
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.073.91
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG96CPolaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32384
Core clock speed500 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors314 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00024.58
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1624
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache32 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 220M 0.36
Radeon 625 2.43
+575%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 220M Samples: 171 160
Radeon 625 Samples: 53 1075
+572%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Valorant 27−30
−63%
40−45
+63%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−233%
50−55
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Metro Exodus 0−1 5−6
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 27−30
−63%
40−45
+63%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−225%
12−14
+225%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 27−30
−63%
40−45
+63%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 18−20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 3−4
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 3−4

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 5−6

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Valorant 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 625 is 550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 625 performs better in 29 tests (57%)
  • there's a draw in 22 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 2.43
Recency 15 June 2009 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 50 Watt

GT 220M has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Radeon 625, on the other hand, has a 575% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 625 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
GeForce GT 220M
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 99 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 150 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 220M or Radeon 625, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.