AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

9800M GT
0.98

Radeon Pro Vega 20 outperforms GeForce 9800M GT by 1295% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1067348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.1814.40
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameNB9E-GT2Vega Mobile
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 July 2008 (15 years old)15 November 2018 (5 years old)
Current price$61 $360
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 20 has 7900% better value for money than 9800M GT.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961280
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed500 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1283 MHz
Number of transistors754 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00102.6
Floating-point performance240 gflopsno data
Gigaflops360no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce 9800M GT and Radeon Pro Vega 20 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1480 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s189.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GT 0.98
Pro Vega 20 13.67
+1295%

Radeon Pro Vega 20 outperforms GeForce 9800M GT by 1295% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9800M GT 381
Pro Vega 20 5299
+1291%

Radeon Pro Vega 20 outperforms GeForce 9800M GT by 1291% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

9800M GT 4011
Pro Vega 20 33590
+737%

Radeon Pro Vega 20 outperforms GeForce 9800M GT by 737% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−1425%
61
+1425%
4K2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hitman 3 0−1 35−40
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 27−30
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−571%
47
+571%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Hitman 3 0−1 35−40
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 27−30
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−443%
38
+443%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1567%
50
+1567%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−933%
31
+933%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Hitman 3 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−138%
18−20
+138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 8−9
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 6−7
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

This is how 9800M GT and Pro Vega 20 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Pro Vega 20 is 1425% faster than 9800M GT

4K resolution:

  • Pro Vega 20 is 1950% faster than 9800M GT

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro Vega 20 is 2000% faster than the 9800M GT.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro Vega 20 surpassed 9800M GT in all 25 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.98 13.67
Recency 15 July 2008 15 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 100 Watt

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GT is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT
GeForce 9800M GT
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 83 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.