Riva 128 vs GeForce 9800 GX2

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking873not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Power efficiency0.73no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG92NV3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 March 2008 (16 years ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256 (128 per GPU)no data
Core clock speed600 MHz100 MHz
Number of transistors754 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)197 Watt4 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate38.400.1
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs641

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 2x
Length267 mmno data
Height2-slotno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth128 (64 per GPU)1.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIDual Link DVI1x VGA, 1x DB13W3
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)5.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 March 2008 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 197 Watt 4 Watt

9800 GX2 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 438.5% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 4825% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GX2 and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9800 GX2
NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 11 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 38 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.