Riva 128 vs GeForce 9200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1244not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.76no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameC79NV3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed450 MHz100 MHz
Number of transistors314 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6000.1
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs41
TMUs81

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 2x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)5.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 1 April 1997
Chip lithography 65 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 4 Watt

GeForce 9200 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 438.5% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200 and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200
GeForce 9200
NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 25 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 40 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.