ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP vs GeForce 9800 GTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800 GTX and Radeon HD 3650 AGP, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9800 GTX
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 140 Watt
1.99
+410%

9800 GTX outperforms ATI HD 3650 AGP by a whopping 410% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8941260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.10no data
Power efficiency0.990.42
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG92RV635
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 March 2008 (16 years ago)23 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128120
Core clock speed675 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors754 million378 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate43.205.800
Floating-point processing power0.4321 TFLOPS0.174 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinFloppy
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMIVia Adapter-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800 GTX 1.99
+410%
ATI HD 3650 AGP 0.39

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800 GTX 769
+413%
ATI HD 3650 AGP 150

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 0.39
Recency 28 March 2008 23 January 2008
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 65 Watt

9800 GTX has a 410.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

ATI HD 3650 AGP, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800 GTX is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 3650 AGP in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GTX
ATI Radeon HD 3650 AGP
Radeon HD 3650 AGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 181 vote

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 24 votes

Rate Radeon HD 3650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.