GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs 9600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600 GT with GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

9600 GT
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 96 Watt
1.26

GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms 9600 GT by a whopping 1167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking999314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.038.33
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameG94N18P-G0 / N18P-G61
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 February 2008 (16 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data
Current price$141 (0.8x MSRP)$1185

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Max-Q has 27667% better value for money than 9600 GT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores641024
CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed650 MHz1020 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1245 MHz
Number of transistors505 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate20.8 billion/sec72.00
Floating-point performance208 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9600 GT and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length9" (22.9 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors6-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9600 GT 1.26
GTX 1650 Max-Q 15.97
+1167%

GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms 9600 GT by 1167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9600 GT 487
GTX 1650 Max-Q 6169
+1167%

GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms 9600 GT by 1167% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−1425%
61
+1425%
1440p2−3
−1300%
28
+1300%
4K1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
−1124%
600−650
+1124%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−1011%
300−310
+1011%
Battlefield 5 63
−1090%
750−800
+1090%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42
−1090%
500−550
+1090%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Far Cry 5 48
−1150%
600−650
+1150%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
−1086%
700−750
+1086%
Forza Horizon 4 74
−1116%
900−950
+1116%
Hitman 3 30−35
−1029%
350−400
+1029%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−1150%
800−850
+1150%
Metro Exodus 71
−1097%
850−900
+1097%
Red Dead Redemption 2 54
−1104%
650−700
+1104%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−1100%
600−650
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−1076%
600−650
+1076%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
−1120%
500−550
+1120%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−1011%
300−310
+1011%
Battlefield 5 55
−1082%
650−700
+1082%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
−1150%
500−550
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Far Cry 5 38
−1084%
450−500
+1084%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−1120%
500−550
+1120%
Forza Horizon 4 179
−1157%
2250−2300
+1157%
Hitman 3 30−35
−1029%
350−400
+1029%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−1150%
800−850
+1150%
Metro Exodus 53
−1126%
650−700
+1126%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
−1122%
550−600
+1122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−1100%
600−650
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
−1126%
650−700
+1126%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−1076%
600−650
+1076%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
−1150%
250−260
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−1011%
300−310
+1011%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Far Cry 5 26
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−1082%
650−700
+1082%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−1150%
800−850
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−1100%
600−650
+1100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−1076%
600−650
+1076%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42
−1090%
500−550
+1090%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 33
−1112%
400−450
+1112%
Far Cry New Dawn 40
−1150%
500−550
+1150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
−1135%
210−220
+1135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−1131%
160−170
+1131%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−1150%
250−260
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−1029%
350−400
+1029%
Hitman 3 18−20
−1163%
240−250
+1163%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
−1150%
400−450
+1150%
Metro Exodus 32
−1150%
400−450
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−1067%
350−400
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−1135%
210−220
+1135%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−1100%
120−130
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−1054%
300−310
+1054%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 11
−1082%
130−140
+1082%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
−1131%
160−170
+1131%
Hitman 3 12−14
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1135%
210−220
+1135%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−1122%
220−230
+1122%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Far Cry 5 9
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−1127%
270−280
+1127%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1135%
210−220
+1135%
Metro Exodus 16
−1150%
200−210
+1150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
−1131%
160−170
+1131%

This is how 9600 GT and GTX 1650 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1425% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1300% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1800% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.26 15.97
Recency 21 February 2008 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 96 Watt 35 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GT is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
GeForce 9600 GT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1913 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 582 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.