Radeon Graphics vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

9400M (G) / ION (LE)
2008
12 Watt
0.31

Graphics outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1331907
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Power efficiency1.779.07
Architectureno dataGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMCP79MXRenoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2008 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16448
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors282 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data42.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.344 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Valorant 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−533%
95−100
+533%
Valorant 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 1.98
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 25% lower power consumption.

Graphics, on the other hand, has a 538.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 6940 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.