Radeon Graphics vs GeForce 9300M G

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9300M G with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

9300M G
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.20

Graphics outperforms 9300M G by a whopping 815% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1447961
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Power efficiency1.189.38
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG86Renoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16448
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20042.00
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs828
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed600 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9300M G 0.20
Radeon Graphics 1.83
+815%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9300M G 84
Samples: 50
Radeon Graphics 764
+810%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Valorant 24−27
−780%
220−230
+780%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Valorant 24−27
−780%
220−230
+780%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Dota 2 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Valorant 24−27
−780%
220−230
+780%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Valorant 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.20 1.83
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 15 Watt

9300M G has 15.4% lower power consumption.

Graphics, on the other hand, has a 815% higher aggregate performance score, and a 1042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M G in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9300M G
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 7983 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300M G or Radeon Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.