Radeon Graphics 384SP vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1394not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.86no data
Architectureno dataGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMCP79MXCezanne
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16384
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data40.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.306 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 October 2008 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 45 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 275% lower power consumption.

Graphics 384SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Radeon Graphics 384SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP
Radeon Graphics 384SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 35 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon Graphics 384SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.