Radeon Instinct Vega vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1392not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.85no data
Architectureno dataGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameMCP79MXVega 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed450 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors282 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt225 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory clock speedno data2400 MHz
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 225 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 1775% lower power consumption.

Instinct Vega, on the other hand, has a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Radeon Instinct Vega. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct Vega is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
AMD Radeon Instinct Vega
Radeon Instinct Vega

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 42 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct Vega on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon Instinct Vega, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.