Quadro RTX A6000 vs GeForce 9300M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9300M G with Quadro RTX A6000, including specs and performance data.

9300M G
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.22

RTX A6000 outperforms 9300M G by a whopping 26550% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking137338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data10.36
Power efficiency1.1813.63
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG86GA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2008 (16 years ago)5 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1610752
Core clock speed400 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors210 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200604.8
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS38.71 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs8336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s768.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9300M G 0.22
RTX A6000 58.63
+26550%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9300M G 84
RTX A6000 22617
+26825%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1176
1440p0−1135
4K-0−1117

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data26.41
1440pno data34.44
4Kno data39.74

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2833%
85−90
+2833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2125%
85−90
+2125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2038%
170−180
+2038%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3750%
150−160
+3750%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−371%
130−140
+371%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2833%
85−90
+2833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2125%
85−90
+2125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2038%
170−180
+2038%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7225%
293
+7225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−856%
85−90
+856%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−371%
130−140
+371%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2833%
85−90
+2833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3600%
70−75
+3600%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2125%
85−90
+2125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2700%
224
+2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7100%
288
+7100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1900%
180
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−371%
130−140
+371%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 30−35
Hitman 3 6−7
−817%
55−60
+817%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−10400%
210
+10400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3500%
70−75
+3500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 27−30

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 247
+0%
247
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 146
+0%
146
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 149
+0%
149
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A6000 is 10400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.22 58.63
Recency 1 February 2008 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 300 Watt

9300M G has 2207.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A6000, on the other hand, has a 26550% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M G in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9300M G is a notebook card while Quadro RTX A6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
GeForce 9300M G
NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate GeForce 9300M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 462 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.