Radeon RX Vega 7 vs GeForce 8800M GTX

Place in performance ranking	1018	499
Place by popularity	not in top-100	10
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.08	10.91
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name	NB8E-GTX	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	19 November 2007 (16 years ago)	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$160	$387

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 7 has 13538% better value for money than 8800M GTX.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	448
CUDA cores	96	no data
Core clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.00	no data
Floating-point performance	240 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 8800M GTX and Radeon RX Vega 7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-HE	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12_1
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	no data
CUDA	1.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTX 1.19

RX Vega 7 7.42
+524%

Radeon RX Vega 7 outperforms GeForce 8800M GTX by 524% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

8800M GTX 3422

RX Vega 7 17714
+418%

Radeon RX Vega 7 outperforms GeForce 8800M GTX by 418% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −667%	23 +667%
1440p	5−6 −540%	32 +540%
4K	2−3 −800%	18 +800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−500%

18
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −156%	23 +156%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14 +367%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	37
Hitman 3	1−2 −2000%	21 +2000%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −2200%	23 +2200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −400%	15 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −157%	18 +157%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −100%	18 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	35
Hitman 3	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −1900%	20 +1900%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −550%	13 +550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −114%	15 +114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −375%	19 +375%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −200%	9 +200%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	27
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −225%	13 +225%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Hitman 3	4−5 −200%	12−14 +200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Hitman 3	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	4−5