Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce 8700M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8200M G 8200M G mGPU AMD 8200M G mGPU Intel 8400M G 8400M GS 8400M GT 8600M GS 8600M GT 8600M GT Mac Edition 8600M GT SLI 8700M GT 8700M GT SLI 8800M GTS 8800M GTX 8800M GTX SLI
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8700M GT SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8700M GT SLI
2007
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.68

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms 8700M GT SLI by a whopping 862% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

8700M GT SLI 8700M GT SLI
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1160541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.9318.45
ArchitectureG8x (2007)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNB8E-SETiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 September 2007 (17 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6480
Core clock speed625 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors578 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt28 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHzno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8700M GT SLI 0.68
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 6.54
+862%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8700M GT SLI 2196
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+889%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%
1440p0−19
4K1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−667%
23
+667%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−600%
14
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−433%
16
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
Valorant 30−33
−153%
75−80
+153%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−470%
110−120
+470%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10
+400%
Dota 2 12−14
−200%
39
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−450%
22
+450%
Valorant 30−33
−153%
75−80
+153%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9
+350%
Dota 2 12−14
−177%
36
+177%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−540%
30−35
+540%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−175%
11
+175%
Valorant 30−33
−153%
75−80
+153%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 6
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 6−7
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Valorant 4−5
−800%
35−40
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21
+0%
21
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12
+0%
12
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how 8700M GT SLI and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1800% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 1733% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 31 test (53%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.68 6.54
Recency 18 September 2007 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 80 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 861.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 107.1% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 8700M GT SLI
GeForce 8700M GT SLI
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

8700M GT SLI GeForce 8700M GT SLI
vs
HD 6520G Radeon HD 6520G
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
8700M GT SLI GeForce 8700M GT SLI
vs
HD 7420G Radeon HD 7420G
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
ATI 9200 PRO Radeon 9200 PRO
vs
ATI HD 4350 HD 4350
GRID M6-8Q GRID M6 8Q
vs
6000 SDI Quadro 6000 SDI
R7 340 OEM Radeon R7 340 OEM
vs
HD 6450 GDDR5 HD 6450 GDDR5
Data Center GPU Max NEXT Data Center GPU Max NEXT
vs
Instinct MI300 Radeon Instinct MI300
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EU
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 HD 4870 X2
W4190M FirePro W4190M
vs
RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
RTX 2070 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
vs
R7 M350 R7 M350
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
vs
GTX 1650 TU106 GTX 1650 TU106

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 962 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8700M GT SLI or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.