Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce 8200M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8200M G 8200M G mGPU AMD 8200M G mGPU Intel 8400M G 8400M GS 8400M GT 8600M GS 8600M GT 8600M GT Mac Edition 8600M GT SLI 8700M GT 8700M GT SLI 8800M GTS 8800M GTX 8800M GTX SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8200M G and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8200M G
2008
0.17

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 4371% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

8200M G 8200M G
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1424540
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.60
Architectureno dataGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameMCP77MV MCP79MVLTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores880
Core clock speed400 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Manufacturing process technology80 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012_1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−120
1440p-0−110
4K-0−114

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−57.1%
11
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1300%
14
+1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−28.6%
9
+28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
Valorant 24−27
−204%
75−80
+204%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−42.9%
10
+42.9%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−945%
110−120
+945%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10
+900%
Dota 2 9−10
−333%
39
+333%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−633%
22
+633%
Valorant 24−27
−204%
75−80
+204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+40%
5
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9
+800%
Dota 2 9−10
−300%
36
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−271%
24−27
+271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−267%
11
+267%
Valorant 24−27
−204%
75−80
+204%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3900%
40−45
+3900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−900%
10
+900%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 6−7
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Valorant 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9
+0%
9
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 8200M G is 40% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 3900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 8200M G is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 31 test (48%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.17 7.60
Recency 3 June 2008 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 80 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 4370.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

8200M G GeForce 8200M G
vs
Go 7400 GeForce Go 7400
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
8200M G GeForce 8200M G
vs
Go 7300 GeForce Go 7300
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
GT 430 PCI 430 PCI
GT 640 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GT 640 Rev. 2
vs
GeForce 920M 920M
Steam Deck GPU AMD Deck GPU
vs
Quadro P2000 P2000
RTX A500 RTX A500
vs
GTX 780 780
HD 8280 Mobile IGP AMD HD 8280 Mobile IGP
vs
R2 Mobile Graphics Mobile Graphics
RTX 4050 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 4050 Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 20 Vega 20
GTX 1660 Mobile NVIDIA GTX 1660 Mobile
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Graphics G7 96EUs
PRO W7800 AMD PRO W7800
vs
RTX 8000 Passive 8000 Passive
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
GT 820M NVIDIA GT 820M
vs
GTX 560 560

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 949 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.