GRID M6-8Q vs GeForce 8400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400 with GRID M6-8Q, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 8400
2007
256 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.21

GRID M6-8Q outperforms 8400 by a whopping 4305% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1383472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.596.45
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG98GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date4 December 2007 (16 years ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$69.78 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81536
Core clock speed540 MHz722 MHz
Number of transistors210 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate4.32069.31
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs896

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA1.15.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 8400 0.21
GRID M6-8Q 9.25
+4305%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 8400 81
GRID M6-8Q 3568
+4305%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.21 9.25
Recency 4 December 2007 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 100 Watt

GeForce 8400 has 300% lower power consumption.

GRID M6-8Q, on the other hand, has a 4304.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID M6-8Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 is a desktop card while GRID M6-8Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400
GeForce 8400
NVIDIA GRID M6-8Q
GRID M6-8Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 26 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M6-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.