GeForce 8200M G vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 and GeForce 8200M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics G7 outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 5869% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 492 | 1480 |
| Place by popularity | 17 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | no data |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | MCP77MV MCP79MVL |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 400 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 80 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 10 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1300%
|
3−4
−1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+400%
|
7−8
−400%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+288%
|
24−27
−288%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+1227%
|
10−12
−1227%
|
| Dota 2 | 70−75
+775%
|
8−9
−775%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1300%
|
3−4
−1300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+400%
|
7−8
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+400%
|
5−6
−400%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+288%
|
24−27
−288%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 70−75
+775%
|
8−9
−775%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+1300%
|
3−4
−1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+400%
|
7−8
−400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+400%
|
5−6
−400%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 55−60 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+7300%
|
1−2
−7300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 100−110
+10600%
|
1−2
−10600%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+850%
|
2−3
−850%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+2200%
|
1−2
−2200%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+42.9%
|
14−16
−42.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 50−55
+5000%
|
1−2
−5000%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Escape from Tarkov | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 5000% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 performs better in 19 tests (70%)
- there's a draw in 8 tests (30%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.55 | 0.16 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 3 June 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 80 nm |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 5868.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
