GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs 7300 SE

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7300 SE with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

7300 SE
2006
256 MB DDR2
0.10

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms 7300 SE by a whopping 36480% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1452131
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.94
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG72TU104B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 March 2006 (18 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed450 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors112 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800220.8
Floating-point processing powerno data7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed266 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.256 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1119
1440p-0−175
4K-0−145

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 111
+0%
111
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Valorant 172
+0%
172
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+0%
129
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60
+0%
60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 113
+0%
113
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Valorant 163
+0%
163
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
World of Tanks 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 118
+0%
118
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 46
+0%
46
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 62
+0%
62
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 36.58
Recency 22 March 2006 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm

RTX 2070 Super Mobile has a 36480% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7300 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7300 SE is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE
GeForce 7300 SE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 20 votes

Rate GeForce 7300 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 394 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.