UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce 610M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 610M with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 610M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.65

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms 610M by a whopping 717% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1168593
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Power efficiency4.3128.15
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF119Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 December 2011 (13 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48256
Core clock speed738 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.90426.40
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
Video decodersH.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080pno data
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64bitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidthUp to 14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 610M 0.65
UHD Graphics 770 5.31
+717%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 610M 291
UHD Graphics 770 1016
+249%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 610M 508
UHD Graphics 770 16443
+3140%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 610M 2210
UHD Graphics 770 2655
+20.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−800%
18
+800%
4K1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−650%
15
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−450%
11
+450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−450%
11
+450%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Valorant 27−30
−131%
65−70
+131%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−380%
95−100
+380%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Dota 2 12−14
−231%
43
+231%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
Valorant 27−30
−131%
65−70
+131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Dota 2 12−14
−208%
40
+208%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−420%
24−27
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−125%
9
+125%
Valorant 27−30
−131%
65−70
+131%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 5−6
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how GeForce 610M and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is 800% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 770 is 1200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 1367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 32 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 5.31
Recency 1 December 2011 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce 610M has 25% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has a 716.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 610M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 610M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GeForce 610M
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 765 votes

Rate GeForce 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1306 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 610M or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.