UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce 705M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
410M 610 610M 705A 705M 800A GT 520MX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 705M with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 705M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.18

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms 705M by a whopping 422% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1076590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.4128.23
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF119Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 September 2013 (11 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48256
Core clock speed475 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.80026.40
Floating-point processing power0.0912 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Standard memory configurationDDR3no data
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 2560x1600no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 2560x1600no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 705M 1.18
UHD Graphics 770 6.16
+422%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 705M 455
UHD Graphics 770 1016
+123%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−500%
18
+500%
4K2−3
−550%
13
+550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−400%
15
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
11
+267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−267%
11
+267%
Battlefield 5 0−1 24−27
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−233%
10
+233%
Fortnite 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Valorant 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Battlefield 5 0−1 24−27
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+33.3%
6
−33.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−273%
95−100
+273%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Dota 2 16−18
−169%
43
+169%
Fortnite 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18
+260%
Valorant 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 24−27
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Dota 2 16−18
−150%
40
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−333%
24−27
+333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9
+80%
Valorant 30−35
−103%
65−70
+103%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−633%
40−45
+633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Valorant 3−4
−2067%
65−70
+2067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 6−7
−383%
27−30
+383%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Dota 2 0−1 14
Far Cry 5 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9
+0%
9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GeForce 705M and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is 500% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 770 is 550% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce 705M is 33% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 2067% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 705M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 42 tests (69%)
  • there's a draw in 18 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.18 6.16
Recency 27 September 2013 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 770 has a 422% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 705M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 705M is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce 705M
GeForce 705M
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
RX 550X Radeon RX 550X
GeForce 705M GeForce 705M
vs
GT 720M GeForce GT 720M
8700M GT SLI 8700M GT SLI
vs
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
9400 GT 9400 GT
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
GT 130M GT 130M
vs
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
Go 7900 GTX Go 7900 GTX
vs
RTX 4060 RTX 4060
HD 6470M HD 6470M
vs
GT 420 OEM GT 420 OEM
GT 320M GT 320M
vs
GeForce 210 210
GeForce 410M 410M
vs
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
HD 6370M HD 6370M
vs
HD 6310 HD 6310
ATI Mobility HD 2600 Mobility Radeon HD 2600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4530 Mobility Radeon HD 4530

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 16 votes

Rate GeForce 705M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1300 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 705M or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.