Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GRID M60-8Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID M60-8Q with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

GRID M60-8Q
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
10.05
+3.6%

GRID M60-8Q outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking414426
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Xe LPG
GPU code nameGM204Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date30 August 2015 (8 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20484
Core clock speed557 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1178 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate150.8no data
Floating-point performance4,833 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GRID M60-8Q and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5012 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth160.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126no data
CUDA5.2no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−4.2%
25
+4.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+2.6%
39
−2.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−3.3%
31
+3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−4.4%
45−50
+4.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+0%
30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−5.6%
18−20
+5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−11.1%
20−22
+11.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GRID M60-8Q and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 4% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.05 9.70
Recency 30 August 2015 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GRID M60-8Q and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc).

Be aware that GRID M60-8Q is a workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
GRID M60-8Q
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate GRID M60-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 3 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.