Quadro 1000M vs GRID M3-3020

Place in performance ranking	495	941
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.13
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GM107	Fermi
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 May 2016 (8 years ago)	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$174.95
Current price	no data	$129 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	96
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	700 MHz
Boost clock speed	1306 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1,870 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	45 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.24	11.20
Floating-point performance	1,672 gflops	268.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GRID M3-3020 and Quadro 1000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

190−200
+414%

−414%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

+350%

4−5
−350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Hitman 3	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Hitman 3	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +400%	14−16 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 +400%	9−10 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +400%	12−14 −400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+400%

2−3
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

+350%

4−5
−350%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +350%	4−5 −350%