GeForce RTX 5090 vs GRID M3-3020

Place in the ranking	530	1
Place by popularity	not in top-100	59
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	11.28
Power efficiency	no data	12.54
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code name	GM107	GB202
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	18 May 2016 (8 years ago)	30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	21760
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	2017 MHz
Boost clock speed	1306 MHz	2407 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	575 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.24	1,637
Floating-point processing power	1.672 TFLOPS	104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	176
TMUs	40	680
Tensor Cores	no data	680
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 5.0 x16
Length	267 mm	304 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	1300 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	1.79 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.4
CUDA	5.0	10.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −1379%	207 +1379%
1440p	12−14 −1433%	184 +1433%
4K	10−12 −1310%	141 +1310%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	9.66
1440p	no data	10.86
4K	no data	14.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2

190−200

+0%

190−200

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Valorant	500−550 +0%	500−550 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Dota 2	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Far Cry 5	159 +0%	159 +0%
Fortnite	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	500−550 +0%	500−550 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	202 +0%	202 +0%
Far Cry 5	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	500−550 +0%	500−550 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	183 +0%	183 +0%
Dota 2	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
World of Tanks	500−550 +0%	500−550 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Valorant	400−450 +0%	400−450 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	174 +0%	174 +0%
Dota 2	180−190 +0%	180−190 +0%
Metro Exodus	167 +0%	167 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	55 +0%	55 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Valorant	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%

This is how GRID M3-3020 and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

RTX 5090 is 1379% faster in 1080p
RTX 5090 is 1433% faster in 1440p
RTX 5090 is 1310% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.34	100.00
Recency	18 May 2016	30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm

RTX 5090 has a 1262.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Be aware that GRID M3-3020 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.