NVIDIA GRID K240Q: specs and benchmarks
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 745 MHz
- Max video memory 1024 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 5000 MHz
- Maximum resolution
NVIDIA started GRID K240Q sales 28 June 2013 at a recommended price of $469. This is Kepler architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 1 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 5 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 160.0 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is an integrated video card. No additional power connector is required, and power consumption is at 225 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at
of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
Of GRID K240Q's architecture, market segment and release date.
|Place in performance rating||436|
|GPU code name||GK104|
|Release date||28 June 2013 (9 years ago)|
|Launch price (MSRP)||$469|
GRID K240Q's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GRID K240Q's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
|Pipelines / CUDA cores||1536||of 18432 (AD102)|
|Core clock speed||745 MHz||of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)|
|Number of transistors||3,540 million||of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)|
|Manufacturing process technology||28 nm||of 4 (H100 PCIe)|
|Thermal design power (TDP)||225 Watt||of 900 (Tesla S2050)|
|Texture fill rate||95.36||of 939.8 (H100 SXM5)|
|Floating-point performance||2,289 gflops||of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)|
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on GRID K240Q's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
|Interface||PCIe 3.0 x16|
Parameters of memory installed on GRID K240Q: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
|Maximum RAM amount||1 GB||of 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)|
|Memory bus width||256 Bit||of 19000 (GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB)|
|Memory clock speed||5000 MHz||of 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)|
|Memory bandwidth||160.0 GB/s||of 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)|
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on GRID K240Q. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
|Display Connectors||No outputs|
APIs supported by GRID K240Q, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmark performance of GRID K240Q. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Let's see how good GRID K240Q is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Overall GRID K240Q performance compared to nearest competitors among server video cards.
The nearest GRID K240Q's AMD equivalent is FirePro R5000, which is faster by 4% and higher by 9 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GRID K240Q:
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.