Quadro4 980 XGL vs GRID K240Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GRID K240Q and Quadro4 980 XGL, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GRID K240Q
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
6.35
+63400%

GRID K240Q outperforms Quadro4 980 XGL by a whopping 63400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5761511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.44no data
Power efficiency2.02no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameGK104NV28 A2
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date28 June 2013 (11 years ago)12 November 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$469 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed745 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate95.362.400
Floating-point processing power2.289 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs1288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz325 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s10.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GRID K240Q 6.35
+63400%
Quadro4 980 XGL 0.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GRID K240Q 2541
+50720%
Quadro4 980 XGL 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.35 0.01
Recency 28 June 2013 12 November 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GRID K240Q has a 63400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID K240Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro4 980 XGL in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GRID K240Q
GRID K240Q
NVIDIA Quadro4 980 XGL
Quadro4 980 XGL

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GRID K240Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 102 votes

Rate Quadro4 980 XGL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GRID K240Q or Quadro4 980 XGL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.